Israel and Turkey Work Closely With Al Qaeda

Iran and Russia are the two big losers in the ouster of Syria's President Bashar al-Assad on Sunday by the Sunni Islamist groups affiliated to al-Qaeda. Assad fled in the nick of time after giving orders that there be a peaceful handover of power. At any rate, a rollback of the Islamist takeover in Syria is out of the question.

The Arab oligarchies of the Gulf region are full of trepidation over the surge of a variant of political Islam that may potentially pose an existential challenge.

Unsurprisingly, they have gravitated toward Iran, whom they see as a factor of regional stability, reciprocating Tehran's call on regional States to circle their wagons to ward off the challenge of 'Takfiri' groups (codename for al-Qaeda and Islamic State in the Iranian narrative.)

Israel and Turkey are the biggest winners, having established links with the al-Qaeda groups. Both are all well-set to project power into Syria and carve out their respective spheres of influence in Syrian territory.

Turkey has demanded that Syria belongs to the Syrian people alone -- a thinly covered call for vacation of foreign military presence (Russian, American and Iranian).

Equally, the Biden administration can derive satisfaction that the Russian military presence will not henceforth remain unchecked and an untenable situation of dramatic loss of influence surrounds Moscow's military bases in the western Syrian province of Latakia.

There is no question that the lame duck administration in Washington will draw vicarious pleasure that the incoming presidency of Donald Trump will have to grapple with prolonged instability and uncertainties in West Asia, an oil-rich region which generates petrodollars that is the underpinning of the Western banking system -- the American dollar, in particular -- that is crucial to the 'America First' axis of the new administration's foreign policies.

To be sure, lurking beneath the surface of the big picture, there are several sub-plots, some of whom at least are of contrarian disposition.

First of all, the renewed calls that are heard jointly from the Astana group (Moscow, Tehran and Ankara) and the regional capitals for intra-Syrian dialogue leading to a negotiated settlement have a ring of unreality stemming out of primeval fear over the manifestation of an extremist variant of political Islam that the region had never experienced before in their history.

Certainly, the current international climate virtually rules out any such prospects of 'dialogue' in the foreseeable future. On the contrary, the entire region is likely to be convulsed by the tremors out of Syria.

The US must be pleased with the regime change in Damascus and will follow up with efforts seeking the closure of Russian bases in Syria. It has declared its intention to continue with the occupation of Syria, which is important if it is to remould the region to meet its geopolitical interests.

Second, Turkey has special interests in Syria in relation to the Kurdish problem. The weakening of the Syrian State, especially the incoming security apparatus in Damascus, provides Turkey for the first time a free run in the northern border provinces where Kurdish separatist groups are operating. The Turkish military and intelligence presence in Syria will expand by leaps and bounds.

Suffice to say, Turkish occupation of Syrian territory may assume a permanent character and even a quasi-annexation of the regions is within the realms of possibility.

Make no mistake, the Treaty Lausanne (1923), which Turkey regards as a national humiliation, has just expired and the hour of reckoning has come for reclaiming Ottoman glory. The present Turkish leadership is committed to the geo-strategy of Neo-Ottomanism.

In all probability, therefore, what is at stake is the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria and the disintegration of the country as a State. It has been reported that Israeli tanks have crossed the border into southern Syria. No doubt, Israel aims at grabbing much more than Syrian territory beyond the Golan Heights.

The dream of Greater Israel has taken a giant step toward realisation.

Next follows Lebanon which Israel cannot but aspire to control if it is to be the dominant regional power in the Levant and an influencer in the politics of the Eastern Mediterranean.

According to the Israeli media, Tel Aviv has direct contacts with the Islamist groups operating in southern Syria. It is no secret that these groups were being mentored by the Israeli army for over a decade.

Thus, at best, a truncated Syria, a rump State, is to be expected with large-scale outside interference continuing, and in a worst case scenario, Turkish revanchism and Israeli aggression taken together -- plus the American occupation of eastern Syria and a weak central authority in Damascus -- the country in its present shape, founded in 1946, may altogether vanish from the map of West Asia.

In fact, the Gulf States and Egypt have reason to worry about an Arab Spring 2.0 -- oligarchies being overthrown and replaced by home-grown militant Islamist groups reflecting the will of the people. Their comfort level with Tehran has perceptibly deepened. But, of course, the US will counter this regional trend which would otherwise isolate Israel in the region.

Russia has a notoriously pragmatic mindset and a foreign ministry statement on Sunday strongly hinted that Moscow is finessing a plan B already to shore up its military presence in Syria in the near term at least.

Interestingly, the statement pointed out that Moscow is in touch with all Syrian Opposition groups. The statement scrupulously avoided using the word 'terrorist', which Russian officials had been freely using in its shrill rhetoric to characterise the Syrian groups who have taken over Damascus.

Moscow has reason to fear the resonance of Political Islam as a seductive ideology in its restive Muslim republics of North Caucasus.

The Russian embassy in Damascus is not in any danger. It is entirely conceivable that Russian intelligence which is traditionally very active in Syria -- for obvious reasons -- had already begun sensitising Moscow on a power transition in Damascus being in the cards and kept contacts with the Opposition Islamist groups, the strident public rhetoric notwithstanding.

In comparison, Iran suffers a serious setback from which it is difficult to recover any time soon, as the ascendancy of the extremist Sunni groups subscribing to the al-Qaeda ideology will lead to a new power calculus in Syria, which is viscerally hostile towards Tehran.

The evacuation of diplomats followed by the storming of the Iranian embassy in Damascus speaks for itself. Indeed, Israel will spare no effort to ensure that Iranian influence is exorcised from Syria.

The heart of the matter is that Iran's regional influence significantly diminishes as the resistance groups (which are largely Shi'ite) become rudderless and disillusioned.

This not only works to the advantage of Israel but also triggers a profound shift in the balance of forces regionally, which will have resonance for the current conflicts in the Greater Middle East as a whole in a long term perspective -- Gaza, Lebanon and even as far away as Central Asia and South Asia.

The bottom line is that the genie of al-Qaeda is out of the bottle, finally, and there is no stopping its pan-Islamic agenda.

The amazing part is that Iran failed to anticipate the turn of events. Incredibly enough, on Friday, December 6, Ali Larijani, the advisor to the Supreme Leader, actually visited Damascus and met with Assad to reiterate Tehran's full backing to stop the tidal wave of Islamist forces that was already nearing the city gates.

Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar retired from the Indian Foreign Service. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.